Archive for October, 2007

Minnesotas_Jat connection

Thursday, October 25th, 2007

Senator Chaudhary believes that agriculture is a binding force  Ishani Duttagupta 

   HE’S the man behind the improbable sounding sibling alliance between our own Haryana and the US state of Minnesota. But then, Satveer Chaudhary, who was elected to the house of representatives in Minnesota in 1996, holds many records. 

   When he was first elected state representative, Mr Chaudhary, who belongs to the Minnesota Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party, became the first Asian member of the Minnesota legislature. In 2000, he became the first Asian-Indian senator in American history. After he was re-elected to the Minnesota senate in 2002, he also became the Minnesota senate’s youngest member at 33 and currently serves as majority whip. Very proud of his Jat roots, Mr Chaudhary was the moving force behind the sister-state partnership agreement between Haryana and Minnesota that was signed during the current visit of Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty to India. “This partnership - which is the first of its kind between a US and an Indian state - has business advantages for both. Minnesota is increasingly seen as a state with a vibrant business climate which is very similar to Haryana. But it’s not just business, culturally too both the states have a lot in common. Minnesota and Haryana are traditionally agricultural states and that gives us common ground not just in terms of economy but also in terms of culture,” says Mr Chaudhary. As for his achievements, he’s very modest and feels that there are high and low points for everyone who chooses a career in politics. 

   “However, I’ve never dwelt on my ethnic minority status or seen my Indianness as a disadvantage in reaching out to people,” he says. He also feels that most Indian-Americans who are in politics have had to work with mainstream causes. “From Swati Dandekar and Kumar Barve to Jay Goyal, no one has really been able to find an ethnic Indian constituency. All of us, who have become legislators in the US, have had to represent the mainstream,” he says. 
   As for
Minnesota, though the state doesn’t have a very large Indian population, Mr Chaudhary feels that Indians such as Gopal K Khanna, who’s Minnesota’s first chief information officer, are making a big impact. “Minnesota is also home to Indian businessmen such as Mahendra Nath, CEO of Nath Companies, who have done the Indian community proud,” he says. He also sees a bright future for Indian companies that are setting up shop in his state. The fact that his state doesn’t have a large number of Indians doesn’t bother him. “New York and San Francisco are like the covers of the US and you can’t judge a book by its covers. I would like Indians to delve into the heart of the US, which is well represented by my state,” he says with pride. Sweet home Minnesota Source : Economic Times , Delhi , India     
 Comments : Very Well Described by Ishani Dasgupta -  Sweet home Minnesota www.commonwealthtv.tv                       Tags:

LETTER FROM LONDON

Thursday, October 25th, 2007
LETTER FROM LONDON
  Going west to the THIRD WORLD
  S U D ES H N A S E N
 
   Yet another Indian professional has landed in the London zoo, and is suffering from culture shock. “My TV”, he says, “is finally working after about two months and my kids are so excited.” In case you’re wondering what we’re talking about, large chunks of London do not get cable (or satellite TV). No, sorry, we really don’t, however incredible that may sound. The service isn’t available for a variety of complex reasons; so we buy sophisticated gadgets to access some free view channels. 
   Another day, I’m talking to an American, who’s moving with her husband to New Delhi. “So, do you think you’ll have problems settling down,” I ask tentatively. “Oh, no. We’ve done a recce. Schools take a bit of time, but you can set up home, bank accounts, internet, phones etc in a week or two. After London, New Delhi’s going to be a piece of cake. I expect to love it.” 
   First the disclaimer. I’m not targeting any specific company here - in fact, they’re all pretty much the same. But there’s nothing I can do to be politically correct about the fact that average customer service standards in London - across the spectrum from banking, hospitality, utilities, telecoms, retail, internet, IT et al - is, to put it mildly, appalling.
   And yes, to make another sweeping generalisation, it’s much worse compared to what you get in urban India today — even more in higher end services like telecom or banking. It can take up to two months to set up a bank account, another three weeks to three months for an internet connection, a week to check a faulty phone line, an hour for an order to be delivered in some of the poshest restaurants. 
   If we manage to find a shop assistant who speaks English and actually knows where the merchandise is, we fall on our knees in gratitude. IT and electronics customer support services - hmm, nobody I know has found any yet.
   So everyone back home in the service industry, please get over your ‘gee-gosh it’s a developed market’ fear. For any smart Indian service provider, the European consumer market is more than ripe for change; as some who are here are already proving. Someone please, please, come and give the poor locals a taste of real customer service, so I can tell ‘em what it’s actually supposed to be like.
   At first, travellers, especially those of us who’ve been brought up on stories of the wonders of the first world, go into gibbering shock.
   Then we get used to it.
   Londoners, when not talking about property prices, swap horror stories about our latest traumas with our respective range of service providers. I could fill a book, but most have one theme in common: there’s little interest in gaining or retaining customers, it’s highly-priced, inflexible, bureaucratic and inefficient, and no, you can’t complain about mistakes. Before anyone bites my head off, ask any Briton. Ideally one who’s spent some time in either Asia or the US in recent years. 
   In a city which claims to be a tourist capital, financial capital, and services capital of the world, it drives foreigners living here, most especially the Americans, nuts. 
   I can see their point. Britain doesn’t litigate like the Americans do, which effectively means that forget about being king, the customer is like some low form of pond life. 
   And no, it’s got nothing to do with outsourced call centres or racism. Britain is not racist; the other extreme if anything. 
   From what I’m able to make out, it has little to do with employees - more with corporate attitude. Service providers here seem to have business models that are all carved in stone, possibly invented in pre-Thatcherite times, and no real new competitors in decades to drive innovation in any segment. Another reason, I’m told, is the European obsession with employee rights has pushed customer rights completely off the map.
   Consider this: signs elaborating the rights of employees are prominently displayed, on walls and websites, larger than nosmoking signs everywhere - look for a sign telling customers where they can take their grouses to, a complaint number, or an email ID, you won’t find one. Only high-cost call numbers or an inconvenient PO box address in the small print somewhere.
   While the great British media and public go hammer and tongs at government services, nobody expects private sector to have a better track record, or scrutinises their standards like in India. But slow or not, strikes or not, in my limited experience, the British government services work as well, if not better, than most private sector companies. Odd, that.
Source : Economic Times , Delhi , India Comments : S U D ES H N A S E N  has written a very beautiful article in the ET , Delhi , India www.commonwealthtv.tv

  Tags:

Set up Business in UK

Thursday, October 25th, 2007
PARADIGM SHIFT    There’s a visible change in the kind of Indians who are choosing to immigrate to the UK. Now the high-end investor category visa is a big draw, finds Ishani Duttagupta   

   FORGET those unhappy images of impoverished and semi-literate young people from Punjab, selling their family land and running away on a mission to immigrate to the UK—in many instances falling prey to unscrupulous agents and being illegally trafficked. In fact, moving to the UK these days is no longer an act of desperation or dare-devilry by adventurous young men from Punjab. The latest statistics from UK Visas, the department that manages migration matters at the British High Commission in Delhi, shows a humungous 500% hike in the investor category of visas in the last twoyear period (April 1, 2005 - March 31 2006 and April 1, 2006 to March 31, 2007). In the same period, work permits for UK went up by 37% and sole representative visas - another category of business visas - went up by 27%. 

   The typical profile of an HNI moving to UK today is probably an young business person with a substantial amount of money to invest, who’s looking at London as a global base. He or she is probably eyeing the markets in Europe and planning to tap the London Stock Market at a later stage. In fact, high net worth Indians who are moving to the UK are providing a leg-up to London’s burgeoning property market too, feel real estate experts. “Many wealthy Indians who are arriving in London are buying high-end properties in premium locations such as Knightsbridge, Kensington, Mayfair and Belgravia. In fact, many of the new Indian immigrants are giving other nationalities a run for their money when it comes to acquiring upscale property. This is a big change from yesteryears when Indian immigrants settled down in modest, middle-class areas such as Southall, Norwood Green and Tooting,” says Superna Sethi, founder of UK’s premium property development firm Manhattan Properties. 

   The investor category visa - which is an ideal vehicle for HNIs from India looking to go global - is meant for those who have at least 1 million pound sterling in their kitty to invest in the UK. Of the entire amount, at least 750,000 pounds must be invested in unit trusts, private companies, off-shore companies and banks or building society accounts. The remaining 250,000 pound sterling may be invested according to the immigrant’s wish. 

   UK-based solicitor and founder of law firm Optimus Law Group, Ms Mona Chawla, feels that the biggest advantage that this category of visa has for well-heeled applicants is the fact that they don’t have to work in UK in the traditional sense. “They can simply ‘invest’ in private companies or unit trusts in the UK and remain in the country to manage their investments. Unlike other UK business visas, applications for investment visas do not require candidates to actively partake in the day-to-day running of a business in the UK. In addition, unlike the skills-based HSMP and innovator visa, no comprehensive points-based assessment is required. An investor visa is intended as a potential route to settled status in the UK and unlike a UK work permit it is an applicant-led process. Investors visas place no work restrictions or time limits upon their holders as with the temporary business visit visa, and ultimately candidates may apply for permanent residence status leading in time to UK citizenship if required,” Ms Chawla told ET. 

   While those who go to UK under the investors’ category have to make UK their main home - they do not need to spend all their time in the UK, it can be only about 50% of their time. Ms Chawla adds that for owners of companies, the investor visa is a very good option considering that the sole representative visa only allows businesses to send their senior level employees to open a UK-based office of an already existing company in India, and the owner of the company will not be eligible under this category. “The biggest problem for the investor category, however, tends to revolve around transferring funds to the UK as the investor must have unrestricted rights to transfer or use the capital,” adds Ms Chawla. 

   Joanne Freeman, first secretary, trade & investment at the British High Commission in India feels that the opportunities the UK offers as the world’s leading investment destination (only after the US though) are helping to attract high net worth investors from India. “The investment climate is favourable and the UK has become a very good place to invest for Indian business people. For Indian entrepreneurs too, UK is among the best places to relocate their business because of similar business practices in the both the countries. It is the gateway to Europe and among the top three countries for investment globally. The favourable tax regime also helps,” Ms Freeman told ET. UK Trade & Investment and UK Visas have been working closely together in India in holding roadshows and field trips in states such as Punjab to increase awareness about business immigration to UK. “During the roadshows in Punjab, we’ve met many potential investors who are looking at relocating to UK under the investors’ programme. There are investors in that region who are looking at investments in sectors such as automotive industries, IT and agro-based businesses,” Mr Chris Feist, second secretary at the visa department at BHC said. 

   Another category of business visas that are attracting a lot of interest in India are the innovator category, which works for those entrepreneurs who have a business idea that will bring very considerable economic benefits to the UK. The entreprenuer category where the applicants will
have to invest £200,000 in a new
UK business and create full-time employment for at least 2 EU nationals can also benefit some Indians. “While there’s a lot of interest in the entrepreneur category, it’s a little tough for small entrepreneurs who have to create two jobs and invest 2 million pounds. Often they end up using the sole representative category instead, which is straight forward and does not require any investment. It also ensures visas for spouses and children,” says Mr Feist.
   Overall, business visas for
UK, including sole representative, investor, entrepreneur and innovator are now a big draw for Indians. Says Mr. Ranjit Malhotra, an advocate whose Chandigarh based law firm Malhotra & Malhotra Associates specialises in immigration and international law: “Business persons become eligible for settlement in the UK if they have spent a continuous period of five years there while being engaged in their business ventures. The applicant is permitted to travel overseas for business promotion trips. This is very helpful for Indian nationals who may have cross-border business commitments. However, one has to be cautious about the absences abroad, since they may have an adverse impact at a later point of time when permanent settlement is being considered.” 
   Mr Malhotra, however, has a word of caution for business immigrants. “Documentation should be meticulous and supported by proof such as business plans, income tax returns, audited balance sheets, bank statements for the last two years, brochures and website details are also important. Track record of the investor is a major issue. In case of sole proprietorship/partnership money should not be pumped into bank accounts all of a sudden. The investor applicant should have a solid financial background and a good stable profile. Also, the business investor should not have any hidden agenda and be actively involved full-time in trading or providing services on his own or in partnership, or in the promotion and management of a company as a director,” he says.

ALL INDIA VISA STATS FOR 2006 FOR UK


Family visitors:
Over 87,000 Business/other visitors: Over 175,000 Students: Almost 20,000

WHY UK ATTRACTS HNIs
World’s leading investment destination (after US) A springboard for global growth that attracts more regional headquarters than any other location worldwide It is an investment multiplier, a jump-off point to further international growth    Source : Economic Times , Delhi  Comments : It is a very educative article to legally set up Business in UK , financial hub of the world .  www.commonwealthtv.tv       Tags:

BILL GATE RECRUITS A CHAIRMAN-Humour

Saturday, October 20th, 2007
Bill Gates: Thank you for coming. Those who do not know JAVA may leave. 2000 people leave the room. Kantibhai says to himself, ‘I do not know JAVA but I have nothing to lose if I stay. I’ll give it a try’ Bill Gates: Candidates who never had experience of managing more than 100 people may leave. 2000 people leave the room. Kantibhai says to himself ‘ I never managed anybody by myself but I have nothing to lose if I stay.
What can happen to me?’ So he stays. Bill Gates: Candidates who do not have management diplomas may leave. 500 people leave the room. Kantibhai says to himself, ‘I left school at 15 but what have I got to lose?’ So he stays in the room. Lastly, Bill Gates asked the candidates who do not speak Serbo - Croat to
leave. 498 people leave the room. Kantibhai says to himself, ‘ I do not speak one word of Serbo - Croat but what do I have to lose?’
So he stays and finds himself with one other candidate.
Everyone else has gone. Bill Gates joined them and said ‘Apparently you are the only two candidates who speak Serbo - Croat, so I’d now like to hear you have a conversation together in that language.’ Calmly, Kantibhai turns to the other candidate and says `kem chho’ The other candidate answers ‘ek dam majama’


Tags:

The Global Millionaire Boom

Friday, October 19th, 2007
Global Millionaire Boom
By Maya Roney  
Household wealth is hitting record heights, and not just in the U.S. There are more millionaire households on the planet than ever before, particularly in Europe and in China, where growth rates are highest.The total number of world millionaire households — those with assets of $1 million or more — grew by 14% in 2006, to 9.6 million, representing the richest 0.7% of all households and owning $33.2 trillion, or about a third of the world’s wealth, according to a recent study by the Boston Consulting Group, a global management consulting firm. “It’s sort of a sexy thing, looking at managing relationships on a household level,” says Bruce Holley, a New York-based partner with BCG, of the study. This is the first global wealth report from BCG that estimates the number of millionaire households per country, as well as estimating total wealth. “This year’s report, our seventh, examines the greatest source of organic growth within wealth management players: namely, their human assets,” write Holley and his colleagues in the report’s preface. China’s Rising — Fast The U.S. had, by far, the highest number of millionaire households, with nearly 4.6 million, and the highest number of $100 million-plus households, with 2,300. The number of millionaire households increased by a steady 10%, while $100-million-plus households grew by 7%, joining the ranks of Microsoft (NasdaqGS:MSFT - News) Chairman Bill Gates and Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK-A - News) Chief Executive Warren Buffett. Japan, Britain, Germany, and China round out the rest of the top five countries with the most millionaire households, in that order. The number of millionaire households increased the most last year in China (up 39%), Spain (up 32%), and Britain (up 30.5%). In Europe, the number of millionaire households grew by 26.4% in 2006, the highest of any region in the study, helped by its strong currency against the weakening U.S. dollar. In North America, millionaire households grew by just 9% in 2006. The United Arab Emirates and Switzerland led the ranking for highest density of millionaire households, with millionaire households accounting for 6.1% of all households in each country — almost nine times the global average. Japan, Britain, Germany, and Italy have the most households in the $100 million-plus bracket, and in terms of growth, China (up 74%), Brazil (up 27%), and Russia (up 26%) saw the highest rates last year. “China is a force to be reckoned with,” says Holley, noting that the country’s total assets under management have grown at an annualized rate of 23% over the past five years. China’s newest billionaire residents will find themselves in the company of powerful businessmen like Suntech Power’s (NYSE:STP - News) Shi Zhengrong, who lives in the city of Wuxi. “Globalization of Inequality” But some see a darker side to all this new wealth. “What these number disguise is the globalization of inequality everywhere in the world,” says Charles Derber, professor of sociology at Boston College and author of Corporation Nation. “This is the phenomenon of the rich getting richer. And it’s not a phenomenon to be happy about — that’s my reaction.” According to new Internal Revenue Service data announced last week, income inequality in the U.S. is at its worst since the 1920s (before the Great Depression). The top percentile of wealthy Americans earned 21.2% of all income in 2005, up from 19% in 2004, while the bottom 50% of wage earners earned 12.8% that year, down from 13.4% a year earlier. As of 2006, the U.S. held about 40% of the world’s wealth and 50% of its millionaire households, according to the Boston Consulting Group. Now in China and India (which ranks 15th in BCG’s list of countries with $100 million-plus households but, interestingly, does not appear in the top 15 nations for millionaire households), it’s clear a substantial upper class is emerging. But rural poverty numbers are also on the rise, according to Derber. Whether you’re for it or not, “this is the name of the game in any part of the world,” he says. “It’s the Gilding Age of the globe.” Check out the slide show to see the 15 countries with the most millionaire households.  
Source : Yahoo - Business Week
Tags:

Yoga Yoga Yoga HRD-TQM

Tuesday, October 9th, 2007
 Watch for the Article http://commonwealthtv.tv Tags: