Archive for the 'DIESEL' Category

Why Oil and Wages Don’t Mix

Sunday, June 29th, 2008
Published: June 29, 2008
Oh what a circus, oh what a show, America has gone to town, Over the death of a mineral called cheap gasoline. We’ve all gone crazy, Mourning all day and mourning all night, Falling over ourselves to get all of the misery right. … WITH great apologies for the above to the greatest librettists and musical show composers of all time, the guys who brought us “Evita,” let us sit down upon the ground and tell sad stories of the death of a beloved hydrocarbon. Now, what I am about to say may shock you. As of this spring in our country, before the immense climb in gasoline prices, the purchase of gasoline and oil amounted to barely 2 percent of national income. Barely 2 percent. Suppose the prices have risen by one-fourth since then. Now gasoline and oil would be roughly 2.5 percent of the total. Or look at it another way. As of this spring, gasoline and oil and heating oil together amounted to about 2.5 percent of total personal consumption expenditures in this great country. Considering the recent price increases, these goods might account for slightly more than 3 percent of such expenditures now. (All of these calculations come from numbers in the March report to Congress from the Council of Economic Advisers.) We are talking about several hundred billion dollars here. I could have a lot of fun with that money, rescuing lost dogs and cats, but it’s not enough to shake the foundations of the nation, at least not a nation of this size. Certainly, it’s not enough to affect even vaguely the incomes of upper-class or upper-middle-income people. The average driver travels about 12,000 miles a year, and if he or she gets 15 miles per gallon (not good mileage at all), the annual gasoline bill would have been about $3,200 a month ago and maybe $3,600 now (if the vehicle uses premium). For people who make a half-million dollars a year, that’s pennies. The increase from a year or two ago also means little to them. The problem comes in another, staggering set of government numbers. (Economists argue about the validity of using these numbers over long periods, but they capture the sorrow of the situation.) Get this, friends: from 1947 to about 1973 — from the days from the great Harry S. Truman to the great Richard M. Nixon — real hourly pay for nongovernment workers rose by about 40 percent. The peak year was the one before R.N. left for San Clemente in 1974. Since then, real wages both hourly and weekly for all nongovernment workers, on average, have fallen by about 5 percent, very roughly. There are all kinds of reasons for this, ranging from the larger size and different composition of the labor force to the devastating foreign competition in manufacturing, which tends to set a limit on other wages as well. But the trend is dismal. The average private worker now earns very roughly $600 a week, not counting fringe benefits. For this worker, gasoline might well account for close to one-tenth of his or her earnings. If the price of gas goes up 25 percent, the effect is serious. To put it mildly, people making $600 a week do not have a lot of leeway on spending. As I see it, the problem is not the price of oil generally. (I think that the price will decline somewhat before long, but the long-term trend is very much up.) The problem is the stagnation of wages. Please bear in mind that the numbers I gave are averages. Skilled workers make much more. Lawyers, doctors, investment bankers, accountants, dentists — they all make more. ( I just paid two dentists a total of more than $10,000 — I am not kidding — to have one poor old tooth get a root canal and a crown, and I’m not finished with that miserable tooth yet. I paid for 90 percent of it out of my own pocket. I do earn more than the ordinary citizen, but nothing by Wall Street standards.) But, obviously, a heck of a lot of workers make less. Imagine what it means to minimum-wage workers for gasoline to surge past $4 a gallon. What is to be done? The federal government can do little to make the price of oil fall in the short run, except, perhaps, for one basic thing: balance the budget. The world price of oil is denominated in dollars. The dollar is weak for many reasons, but a big one is the immense budget deficits run by our government. If President Bush and Senators John McCain and Barack Obama were to stand together in front of a camera and solemnly swear that they would balance the budget in four years, even if it required tax increases on people earning millions, the dollar would rise against the euro, and oil would fall in dollars. But that will not happen. So the only thing for workers to do is to drive less, buy fuel-efficient cars and trucks and, above all, whip their children into a frenzy to get more education. Not many doctors and lawyers are worried about the high price of gasoline. Not many people at hedge funds are worried about filling the tanks of their Bentleys. WE need more human capital in our labor force and more efficiency in fuel use. These will have to reverse the trend in real wages and the real cost of gasoline. Balancing the budget would be good, too, but I won’t hold my breath. Meanwhile, it’s all a bit discouraging — especially the trend for wages. But we will get through it, just as we get through everything else, one adaptive, smart American at a time.
Ben Stein is a lawyer, writer, actor and economist. E-mail: ebiz@nytimes.com.

High Fuel Costs Are Squeezing Low Air Fares

Friday, June 20th, 2008
For years, Southwest Airlines and JetBlue operated under self-imposed fare caps, promising travelers that no ticket would cost more than $299 one way. Those were the days. Want to fly from Boston to Long Beach, Calif.? On JetBlue, it will now cost as much as $599 each way. A one-way ticket on Southwest from Manchester, N.H., to Ontario, Calif., can be $414. The low-fare airlines aren’t so low anymore. Jet fuel costs — up more than 80 percent over last year — are forcing the airlines to sharply raise some fares, and reinvent themselves to appeal to not just bargain hunters, but also the briefcase crowd that generally pays more for last-minute tickets. No longer does Southwest’s slogan promise, “You are now free to move about the country.” “The reality is that fares must go up,” said Davis S. Ridley, Southwest’s senior vice president for marketing and revenue management. “The arithmetic doesn’t work if we transport five people across the country at $99 each way.” Airlines like Southwest, JetBlue and AirTran have been able to offer cheap fares for years because of their lower operating costs, for reasons that include simpler jet fleets, work rules and less-sprawling route networks. Their low prices and rapid growth forced the largest carriers to cut fares whenever they entered a market. They still offer deals for passengers who book trips well in advance, travel off-season and at less popular times. But in general, bargains are getting harder to find, as low-fare carriers join the bigger airlines in raising fares, which are up about 18 percent industrywide this year. About half a dozen smaller carriers, including Denver-based Frontier, have also gone out of business or entered bankruptcy this year, in part because of high fuel costs. Industry experts say the dividing line between the low-fare airlines and the largest carriers is blurring. “You don’t have the gigantic gulf of difference you had earlier this decade,” said Philip A. Baggaley, a senior credit analyst with Standard & Poor’s Rating Services. Southwest says it is trying to set itself apart on the issue of fees, if not fares. Major airlines are piling on new fees, like the $15 charge that American, United and US Airways charge some passengers to check a bag. Southwest still allows passengers to bring two free bags, and its marketing slogan is now “Freedom from fees.” Mr. Ridley, the Southwest executive, calls the fees other carriers are charging “airline heroin” because of the dangerous addiction they can become for raising revenue. The sales pitch resonates with some travelers. David Willenborg, a sales manager for a food manufacturer from Plano, Tex., said Thursday that Southwest’s lack of fees helps save his company money on top of the lower fares it offers for many routes that he flies regularly. He paid $415 round trip to Detroit this week, about 30 percent more than in the past, but he was able to check his suitcase and golf clubs free. On American, the round-trip fare would have been more than $1,000, he said, plus $40 for the bags. But Southwest is trying other means to generate extra revenue beyond raising fares. Despite its new slogan, it now offers a service that it calls Business Select. For a fee of $15, $20 or $25, depending on the length of flight and the fare, passengers get a cocktail, an extra credit on their frequent-flier program, and the right to board with the first group of passengers (Southwest does not offer assigned seats). Dave Anthes, an oil company salesman from Chesterfield, Mo., said he was willing to pay the extra money to ensure his choice of a seat on crowded flights. The priority boarding system, he said, is perfect for business travelers who do not have time to arrive early. “You used to have to get here two hours ahead of time and stand in line,” said Mr. Anthes, who was interviewed at the Detroit Metropolitan airport. JetBlue and AirTran, which joined the big airlines in adding a fee for a second bag, but not the first, say they are trying to strike a balance. “Low-fare carriers are not immune from oil prices,” said Robert L. Fornaro, AirTran’s chief executive. “We’ve had to recapture the price of oil. The question is, ‘How do you get there, fares or fees?’ We think it’s better to do both.” AirTran, which has offered business class on its planes since 1998, provides seat assignments on its top-priced fares at no charge, but charges $6 to select a seat for passengers flying on discounted coach tickets (it costs $20 to reserve an exit-row seat.) JetBlue has changed one of its original policies to be more attractive to business travelers. Before this year, it did not offer refunds to passengers whose plans changed. But in January, JetBlue introduced refundable fares, which the airline says generally cost $50 to $100 more each way than its nonrefundable tickets. Refundable tickets are marketed mostly to corporate customers. JetBlue recently joined four large reservation networks, a unique step for a low-fare airline. “Business customers like options,” said David Barger, JetBlue’s chief executive. “They’ll pay more for a premium seat in a coach cabin.” The option has been a boon to Skip Pleninger, vice president of Paris-Kirwan, an insurance company in Rochester. “I need to be able to switch my flights last-minute,” he said. For example, two of his meetings in New York City were canceled last week. Mr. Pleninger paid for that flexibility. If he books ahead, his fares generally are around $154; his fare for the trip this week was nearly $350. Mr. Barger said his airline was trying to maintain its thrifty image while coping with the “new normal” created by high fuel prices. “You can’t bust the brand. People still need to know they’re going to get value pricing,” he said. “But we’re asking the traveling public to participate by buying higher fares.”
Kathryn Carlson reported from Kennedy Airport in New York and Nick Bunkley from Detroit.

MERRY CHRISTMAS - MONEY IS LOOKING FOR YOU

Saturday, December 9th, 2006
I recently joined AGLOCO because of a friend recommended it to me. I am now promoting it to you because I like the idea and I want you to share in what I think will be an exciting new Internet concept.
AGLOCO’s story is simple:
Do you realize how valuable you are? Advertisers, search providers and online retailers are paying billions to reach you while you surf.  How much of that money are you making? NONE!
AGLOCO thinks you deserve a piece of the action.
AGLOCO collects money from those companies on behalf of its members. (For example, Google currently pays AOL 10 cents for every Google search by an AOL user. And Google still has enough profit to pay $1.6 billion dollars for YouTube, an 18-month old site full of content that YouTube’s users did not get paid for!
AGLOCO will work to get its Members their share of this and more.
AGLOCO is building a new form of online community that they call an Economic Network. They are not only paying Members their fair share, but they’re building a community that will generate the kind of fortune that YouTube. But instead of that wealth making only a few people rich, the entire community will get its share.
What’s the catch? No catch - no spyware, no pop-ups and no spam - membership and software are free and AGLOCO is 100% member owned. Privacy is a core value and AGLOCO never sells or rents member information.
So do both both of us a favor: Sign up for AGLOCO right now! If you use this link to sign up, I automatically get credit for referring you and helping to build AGLOCO. http://www.agloco.com/r/BBBH2142

OIL FOR ENERGY SECURITY

Sunday, November 5th, 2006
The rising crude prices and the power politics behind it is forcing developed and developing economies to generate alternate fuels to protect their future of energy.   The efforts are on creating solar energy, nuclear energy, hydel energy, coal energy and bio energy.   Recently , Richard Branson  announced and committed his future 10 years income of virgin group to invest in producing bio-fuels to be blended with petrol and diesel.   India launched the Ethanol programme last January for blending ethanol upto 5% in her 80% of the states to start with .The  major public sector oil companies account for 99% distribution of petrol.   The planning commission of India has also planned to replace 5% of current 42 million tons of diesel consumed every year with bio-diesel produced from jatropha seeds in about 4-5 years. Fortune 500 companies like Reliance India ltd. has acquired huge blocks of land for growing seeds.   Government of India is giving special incentives and tax holdings to the business organizations going into growing jatropha seeds The estimated demand of ethanol for 2006 is 132 million tones and for 2007 is 570 million tones. This will help the countries worldwide to reduce their dependence on the oil producing countries.   N.B-Business houses interested in acquiring large chunks of land in India at throw away prices to grow jastropha may address their queries to, mbnsl1@gmail.com.