Archive for the 'MONEY' Category

World Peace - Laughter Connection

Friday, March 5th, 2010
DECEMBER 4 is the World laughter day since last 4 yeras announced by a group of people for the world peace
and prosperity - being practiced in India - Maha Maya Ananta and Sri Sri Virat Sri- Sant Lal Chugh Foundation ,
New Delhi 110065   .
The laughter is best symbol of peace and properity in the Universe .
Only we the human beings have the Gods power to laugh who actually laughs through
and gets thrilled on his fun and entertainment .
The whole sky can eco with the collective laughing voices of all the human occeans. impacting
the entire Cosmos and warning any ET aliens if any that the planet earth is very powerful ,peaceful ,
united in one chorus which can shake the foundations of the galaxy .
This will also convey the wholeness of our planet oneness of all the religious systems .
Great laughter sends the message to the mind that every thing is fine every day .
Now you imagine millions of people laughing and dancing at the same time on 4th December in
small gatherings - all TV channels playing comedy soaps the whole day , Schools and colleges praying for
world peace - will send a message to the collective conscious of the Universal mind that every thing is perfectly
fine here on the planet earth .
Mind does not distinguish between reality and imagination .
So even if the laughter is artificial the collective universal mind will believe that truly every thing is fine .
This cumminication will bring more benevolence and supernatural Divine love
of God in every body’s heart creating long lasting peace and happiness with deep sense of security and
vibrational change in the mother earth’s total environment .
All beings in the universe will dance with joy , peace and love .
Large scale tele-conferences should be done , webinars , speeches by the leaders of all walks including Cine actors ,
Sports stars and Politicians  -
Sessions of jokes .
All mass media channels to run free advertisements .
This will help raise lot of charity from us the affluent in the society to be spent
on the needy in the underdeveloped world .to encourage education and healthcare ,
entrepreneurship , brotherhood with music love and dance .
Power of laughter is great and can make the Universe of humanity smile , laugh
and shed the toxins out of their bodies and get healed .
This is very important part of the conventional Indian yoga to heal and enhance energy
levels of the highets pure divine nature .
The day can easily carry real and subliminal messages of green earth ,eco friendly developements and
reduced global warming .
Who so ever chooses can do it daily for his own benefit .
Infact no one has dared to tax the breathing and the laughter .
We can continually keep providing content on  the subject of laughter from the ancient
Indian wisdom of the sages  .
Looking foward to your further inputs to carry on this mashaal of love
energy fire and occeanic peace and stillnes .
Best wishes ,
Prince Mohan - New Member of WPPS since yesterday .
God bless the awakening of the planet mother earth making every body
aware of him self  .
Prince Mohan
Bankers to the Universe

Prayer of Wealth

Wednesday, February 24th, 2010
know God is the Source of all supply, and Wealth is the Source in action, and is to be used to sow goodness throughout the Universe.I know my good is now freely flowing to me so bountifully I cannot use it all, and I have an abundance to spare and to share, today, and always. I know that Wealth comes in many forms.  I  Am expecting “Unexpected Wealth” in all of its forms. My finances are Whole.  My body is Whole. My mind is Whole. My spirit is Whole. My relationship are Whole. My Life is Whole. I know that the Creator has always provided for me, I now recognize it, acknowledge it and I know God is giving this to me and I accept this as Truth and give thanks with a sincere and grateful heart. Ashe. All channels of Wealthy supply are now open to me and I am richly, bountifully and beautifully prospered in every good way. I know that true Wealth includes right relationships, optimum health, patience, grace, clean air and water, healthy environments, happiness, understanding, wisdom, love, peace, joy and prosperity. This I speak in Faith and my knowing now activates the law of increased Universal good for me, my friends and my enemies and I expect to see wealth and abundance in Our Lives, this day, right Now. I claim and accept it. Thank YOU Creator, for it is Universal Law; ask and ye shall receive – for if we ask not we have not.  We have knocked and the door shall be opened. I Am grateful for all You have already given, I bless All that I already have and give praise and thanksgiving for it.  I bless the increase and I Am thankful for the true Spirit of Wealth showing up in my Life. Thank you for Unexpected Wealth for us All for I know that we are now prospering together in every good way and we share the good we receive. Strengthen us that we may Become great Stewards of the Earth sowing Love, Peace and Goodness abound. I now freely give my BEST to the Universe in thought, in deed and in word. I let go and allow Universal Goodness to transcend, through me, into the World. God gives to me rich financial, physical, mental and spiritual blessings right Now. Thank you God. And so It Is. Posted on www.templeofwealth.wordpress.com

David Icke - And the truth shall set you free

Thursday, January 7th, 2010
Dear David , I have started reading your book
“And the truth shall set you free” . This is a remarkably brilliant eye opening
book . Great appreciation for your work , please accept . We have interacted with some brotherhood societies
and always found them socially responsible and doing
noble projects with social objectives as priority . Yes of course they do assist the brotherhood members
to enhance their knowledge and social standing . However even if it was that the global elite or the illuminati
control the things in the world may not be questionable because
the world wide members may not know their agenda or plans . But if you see around you micro to macro families and organisations
you find that they are being controlled by some one . Every one however well place in the world he may be , is having some one
above him to be answerable to . May it be the individual or
government tax authorities . The world as a chain of things has to have some fountain heads
some where in the world in some form or the other . It is an old system in the new packaging . Alexander the Great , King Solomon , Genghes Khan , Chanakya in India had similar agenda as of the brotherhood networks . There is another point that these and many other imperialists
did contribute in bringing the world closer and make it a global village today
and create affluence in the society in many parts of the world . Colonialism was no more viable and it was difficult to manage the
countries physically with few foreigners in the light of growing
literacy which was created by the Colonial rulers only . They thought of a better way and that was to use them to create larger economies for them selves and others by freeing them from colonialism to self rule . Even if the money was lent and interest charged on the money which never existed and does not exist even today , what is the issue . They helped increase the exploitation of world’s resources and create
more and more employment , literacy , awareness and many other things . In the absence of the funny money which is also energy like the real money
there would have been more focuss on primitive wars to control other countries resources which they now try to control through economic
carots . Still the under developed areas are developing and getting modernised . Large number of companies world wide have come up because of their
banking of creating money out of thin air , Vnture capital funds , private equity and debt etc . They have created large number of educated professional work bees globally
instead of primitive work class . However Indian sages have always said that the spiritualism and materialism
should be equally balanced for true Karma Yoga . Enormous amounts wealth , money , power and resources are being continously added by them as per your version . What is the need for these beyond a point . Do they only like this instead of enjoying their lives with their families . What ever the Universal Laws they might have known in advance  they still are human beings with senses and emotions . Or their agenda is to capture another planet for their migration at some point or expand their resources through these planets to increase their wealth on the earth . Or they are still reporting directly to another civilisation or the fourth dimension . Do they have the knowledge that the earth may explode and they need to escape to some other place . If their knowledge of the universal laws is highly advanced then they know most of the things which others don’t . Our sages have known and talked about these things long ago even before these people had probably landed on the earth . These sages invented zero and the decimle for the mathematics of this world . Your idea there is awakening of the cosciouness today is great .
This can bring back the spiritual and material balance . With the many organisations promoting this globally is visible clearly . The internet is also full of this . With the reemergence of the female power it is becoming easier also . Please think isn’t this also doctored that so many people research about them and openly write against the global elite and illuminati under their nose . This is what may be suiting them to create fear and guilt in the world . This gives them more superiority and power over others with free publicity
world wide to their advantage even if their agenda is much less or nil . This also gives you lot of power to control minds of your fans through the
author and reader relationship . Will the balance of spiritaulism and materialism work . Since the evolution good and evil have been existing together even during the best golden periods of Satyuga . I truly appreciate you again for bringing awareness and such a powerful piece of work full of information and knowledge . Best wishes for your ongoing work . www.currentnewsaffairs.com Tags - David Icke , Author , And the truth shall set you free , Book , World wide

Entrepreneurial Drain India - An Open Letter To the Prime Minister

Monday, December 14th, 2009
Mr.Manmohan Singh
The Honorable Prime Minister of India
South Block,
New Delhi 110001
  Mr.P.Chidambream
The Hnorable Finance Minister of India
North Block,
New Delhi 110001
  Dear Sir,
  We are submitting below an important aspect of the country’s
Business and sincerely hope that you will kindly give it your attention
  Entrepreneurial Drain in India
  This goes back to the seventies when the govt. of India started encouraging small scale industries and the young entrepreneurs.  The backward areas were started to industrialise many states in the country. Many schemes to attract younger generation to start industries in these backward areas were promoted. The schemes were very luring.  One such backward area was a hilly region of North India.  The schemes announced were (a) Cheaper land in instalments (b) electricity subsidy, (c) freight subsidy (d) easy loans (e) central subsidy etc. and many more. These were really really backward areas and the incentives were no where near the incentives being offered now in such regions which are though developed now. This was like setting up a new country those days in the backward areas with no tools with the state govt.  to implement. Industrial lands were absolutely unorganized.  There were no roads, no electricity connections, and no telephone facilities.   The infrastructure was absolutely zero. The luring brochures and advertisements, promotional meetings were very attractive and promising as if there were mines of wealth waiting in those regions. Some bold and brave entrepreneurs with ambitious plans to succeed in these virgin areas dared to venture out in these backward areas. Few hundred small scale industries were set up against many hazards by these entrepreneurs. The lands were allotted but handed over very late. The electricity connections were given very late.  The state govt. was not geared up to provide the infrastructure.  The financial corporation would sanction term loans easily but make extraordinary delays in disbursing the same by creating frivolous excuses. There were no start up capital funds , incubation funds, venture capital or private equity funds at that time like today.  The economy was not free.  Every thing was licensed.  The state govt’s had promised flow of raw materials and marketing the finished products of the small scale industries.  But the state administration was not trained in these matters.  The administrative heads of these organizations did not know any thing about the industry.  These developmental institutions neither had the developmental attitude nor the commercial attitude.  There was no value of the entrepreneurial time, money and energy. The raw materials were not available in the state and the finished goods did not have consumption there.  The skilled labor was not available.  Qualified staff technical or financial was not willing to go and stay in these areas because of total lack of infrastructure and general facilities. The cost of production was far higher compared to developed areas of the country. There were project delays, cost over runs.  The entrepreneurs did not have much of promoters’ capital.  The projects started becoming sick within a short time of starting.  There was no policy of sick unit’s rehabilitation at that time.  If there was it was for the large industries who were well connected.  Banks had their problems of giving working capital limits because of lack of security.  Units became sick and ninety percent of these were forced to shelve production and get into the hassle of labor problems and defaults with the financial corporations and the banks, raw material suppliers etc. The financial corporations have a draconian law of acquiring the assets of any unit financed by them under section 29 of the state financial corporations act.  No other financial institution or banks have these powers in India and probably in any part of the world, to take over the assets of a unit. The financial corporations acquired many units and sold these at throw away prices in connivance with outsiders without providing proper opportunity to the promoters of the units.  These units were sold around one tenth / twentieth of the value of the fixed assets along with other fixed assets and inventories which did not belong to them.   After the sale of the units there usually arose a difference between the amount and the amount recovered from the sale proceeds. These amounts were loaded with recurring interest and other frivolous costs to show higher recoverable amounts and the sue the promoters for recovery in the courts and high courts. The entrepreneurs could not either persue the suits or bear the costs of contesting. Then came the debt recovery tribunals with specific mandate to favour the financial institutions and the banks. The cases were shifted to other states where the DRT’s became operational. The entrepreneurs had to face suits from the financial corporations and banks without the power to contest.  The justice became injustice.  The fault was not of the entrepreneurs.  The fault was national by making policies for the states industrialization without the infrastructure.  All good nations first make the infrastructure, raw material organizations, marketing organizations venture capital, private equity funds and stock exchanges for small enterprises and then invite the entrepreneurs.  Japan is an example The MNC’s and large industries bargain for concessions with the govt. Hundreds of capable entrepreneurs of the seventies and eighties are still facing legal suits in India from the lenders even today in 2009.  All these entrepreneurs contributed towards developing the backward areas, creating employment, paying taxes towards sales tax , excise duties etc thus building a nation.  There were no exemptions in those times in the backward areas for sales tax, excise duty and complete income tax holiday etc. These great contributors to the industrialization of India suffered a lot an account of the policies which were not coordinated professionally between the centre and the states. They were not able to start industries else where. They had to bear lot of social embarrassment. Now setting up a small scale industry is as expensive as large scale industry of those times.  Every young man these days looks for white collared jobs instead of looking to start a new industry. Setting up a new industry in the backward areas of the seventies and eighties was a tremendous task. The units acquired by the financial corporation and sold then are now worth thousands of times at market values today.  The entrepreneurs still face the legal suits. The corporation or the banks are institutions and can afford to persue the cases.  The entrepreneurs are individuals who not even have the records of twenty to thirty years to prove their innocence by proving that the financial institutions and state govt’s were responsible for the mass scale failure of industries in the backward areas at that time.  Today backward areas are flourishing cities compared to those times when the backward areas were barren lands. There has been gross injustice to the entrepreneurs’ generation of the seventies and eighties for their only fault of contributing to the industrialization of the nation. This should be in very good spirit for the flourishing economy of the country to acknowledge their contributions. All the cases pending in the courts or debt recovery tribunals should be withdrawn and let the entrepreneurial spirit of the country rise to great heights. Even the World Bank waives many loans of many govt’s in the world. Today the govt. has promoted skill Development Corporation with an initial capital of Rs 1000 /- crores.  Many industrial houses have come up with venture capital funds for the start ups and private equity funds.  The worlds many leading funds have set up shop in India. Those days large industry was lent rupees twenty to Rupees hundred crores per unit and with twenty crores hundreds or more small scale units were lent.  Many of those medium and large scale units went sick and the loans were either waived or not recovered or given fresh loans to start again. It is time to create an amnesty type scheme, withdraw the suits from DRT’s and other courts and waive the loans granted in seventies and eighties in the backward areas especially the hilly states. There have been amnesty and waiver schemes of income tax , registrar of companies and others in the past.. This will also save the nation multi million Rupees spent on legal battles of DRT’s and the courts. This will help divert the valuable resources time, money and energy to more productive and creative areas of nation building. The entrepreneurs of the seventies and eighties are now older people and many of them senior citizens. It will help them avoid the pending legal hassles. Their experience can be rather useful in other areas of the nation. Well wishers and entrepreneurs of many effected industries of hilly backward area of the seventies and eighties 1e 13 jhandewalan extension New Delhi 110055 cc.1.FICCI      2. CII      3. PHDCCI     New Delhi Tags:

Help India Now - Love India Now

Wednesday, February 18th, 2009
Dear All
 
 
 
I have signed the petition and am forwrding it to my contacts.
 
HELP INDIA NOW
……………………..
 
We all must support Indian economy, so please do your best and keep
 forwarding this request to all your contacts and ask them to keep forwarding.
Please forward it to your stock brokers and Bank’s Senior Executives and their
efforts could be very helpful re investments.
 
(1) As far as possible, buy ‘made in India’ only, even if it costs a bit more.
I buy Indian Basmati, although Pakistani Basmati is  cheaper.
 
It is very importantto buy Indian Textiles and Crafts NOW for personal use
and to give as gifts to friends, relations and Business contacts in India and
abroad, as these industries employ millions and due to fewer export orders
they need help URGENTLY.
 
(2) Under no circumstances buy anything from Pakistan or China.
China is likely to ‘dump’ hugely subsidies products in India, as its exports to
the US/EU etc are gowing down sharply. 
 
(3) All people of Indian origin should try to send more foreign exchange to India
NOW and Indian Businesses should covert foreign earnings in to RS. a.s.a.p.
 
      (a) Indian Banks are safaer than the US/UK/ EU Banks. Funds in foreign Currency     Deposit Accounts earn good interest and can be sent out of India any time, if required.
 
       (b) Subject to your personal circumstances, please selectively buy Indian Shares,
as they offer huge value at current prices. foreign Institutional Investors have sold Billions of Dollars worth shares in India as in other developing countries, mainly because their Head Offices were or are nearly bankrupt and they need cash at any costs. They  have used most of their investments and are unlikely to be able to depress the Indian stocks and shares from now on. So any positive news or lack of negetive news would support the Indian share prices with a chance of making significant capital
gains. The Indian Ruppee will also become stronger  which would means currency excahnge gain as well for NRIs.
 
If you do it now, I know you guys will thank me after one year. All you would owe me
is nice Lunch at Mumbai’s TAJ and I will be there.
 
Jai Hind.
 
With love and best wishes
 
Vipul
London. UK.

Stocks Decline as Earnings Reveal Fallout of Credit Crisis

Wednesday, October 22nd, 2008
Published: October 21, 2008
Worries about the corporate sector sent stocks on Wall Street lower again on Wednesday, with the Dow Jones industrials dropping more than 400 points before recovering slightly. Improvements in the credit markets — including the third straight day of declines in bank borrowing rates — did little to placate stock investors who are eying the corporate consequences of an economy that many economists believe is already in a recession. Earnings reports have been weak this week, and many companies have warned about lower sales and a bleak outlook for the remainder of the year. The problems have appeared in a range of industries. The aviation giant Boeing saw profits fall 38 percent last quarter. Merck, the pharmaceutical company, posted a 28 percent drop in net income and will cut jobs. The North Carolina-based bank Wachovia, which was recently acquired by Wells Fargo, suffered a $23.7 billion net loss. At noon, the broad Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index was down 3.2 percent. The Nasdaq composite index was off about 1.9 percent, despite gains in shares of Apple and Yahoo. The Dow, after falling more than 200 points on Tuesday, was off 284.59, at 8,749.07, with 29 of the 30 components of the index in retreat. Oil prices hit a low for the year, falling below $68 a barrel. The cost at which bank lends to one another, as measured by the key Libor rate, fell again for 3-month and overnight loans. The market jitters began earlier overseas. In late afternoon trading, the DJ Euro Stoxx 50 index, a barometer of euro zone blue chips, was down 5.4 percent, while the FTSE 100 index in London lost 4.5 percent. The CAC-40 in Paris was off 5.1 percent and the DAX in Frankfurt slipped 4.5 percent. In Tokyo, the benchmark Nikkei 225 stock average plunged 6.8 percent after three days of gains as the yen surged. NEC Electronics plummeted about 20 percent. The electronics company shocked investors by slashing its annual operating profit forecast by 90 percent to 1 billion yen, or $10 million, citing weak demand. In Sydney, the S&P/ASX 200 closed 3.4 percent lower. The Hang Seng index in Hong Kong closed more than 5 percent lower, as Citic Pacific fell 24 percent. The company this week predicted a trading loss of up to $2 billion caused by what it said were unauthorized bets on foreign exchange markets. “The main story is that deleveraging among financial institutions is continuing,” Derek Halpenny, senior currency economist at Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ in London, said. “Banks worried about funding are selling assets to reduce their balance sheets.” The wave of coordinated global bailouts has helped banks’ capital ratios, he noted, but there is a painful readjustment under way that will require some time to work through. The dollar soared against European currencies. The euro fell to $1.2858, its lowest since November 2006, from $1.3063 late Tuesday in New York. The dollar rose to 1.1665 Swiss francs from 1.1512 francs. Expectations that European central bankers will cut interest rates to stimulate growth has reduced the incentive for investors to buy short-term assets based in those currencies. In Britain, the pound fell to $1.6260 from $1.6707, after the Bank of England governor, Mervyn King, warned that the British currency could come under pressure, and acknowledged that the country had entered what could be a painful recession. “Taken together, the combination of a squeeze on real take-home pay and a decline in the availability of credit poses the risk of a sharp and prolonged slowdown in domestic demand,” Mr. King said Tuesday in Leeds, England. But the yen trumped all other currencies. The dollar fell to 99.27 yen from 100.13, while the euro fell to 127.69 from 131.58. Mr. Halpenny said the yen was benefiting from its position as a safe-haven currency, supported by the fact that Japan is running a large current-account surplus. United States crude oil futures for December delivery fell $3.22, or 4.5 percent, to $68.96 a barrel.
David Jolly and Bettina Wassener contributed reporting.

Paulson Says Banks Must Deploy Capital

Tuesday, October 14th, 2008
Paulson Says Banks Must Deploy Capital
Matthew Cavanaugh/European Pressphoto Agency

Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr., speaking in Washington on Tuesday morning, described the government’s bailout as “extensive, powerful and transformative.”


Article Tools Sponsored By
Published: October 14, 2008
WASHINGTON — Describing the government’s financial bailout plan as “extensive, powerful and transformative,” Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr. said Tuesday that the injection of $250 billion into the nation’s banks was needed to restore confidence and avoid a collapse of the financial system.
Skip to next paragraph

Multimedia

The Rescue Plan and Its Largest RecipientsGraphic

The Rescue Plan and Its Largest Recipients

Beneficiary BanksGraphic

Beneficiary Banks

Doug Mills/The New York Times

“This is an essential short-term measure to ensure the viability of the American banking system,” President Bush said from the Rose Garden on Tuesday morning.

Speaking shortly after President Bush used similar terms to describe the proposal, Mr. Paulson said the Treasury would make $250 billion available to banks to help recapitalize those banks and to get them lending again, among themselves and to businesses and consumers. “The needs of our economy require that our financial institutions not take this new capital to hoard it, but to deploy it,” Mr. Paulson said, who offered some details of the plan along with the Federal Reserve chairman, Ben S. Bernanke, and the chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Sheila C. Bair. With the proposal, the United States follows similar plans announced Monday across Europe — almost all intended to inject money into the banks and unfreeze the credit markets. Markets around the world have rebounded on news of the coordinated efforts. The Dow Jones industrial average gained 936 points, or 11 percent on Monday, the largest single-day gain in the American stock market since the 1930s, and gained more than 300 points more in the opening minutes of trading on Tuesday. European markets were up at least 5 percent on Tuesday after rising nearing 10 percent Monday. In addition to injecting money into the banks, according to the plan, the United States would also guarantee new debt issued by banks for three years — a measure meant to encourage the banks to resume lending to one another and to customers. The F.D.I.C. would also offer an unlimited guarantee on bank deposits in accounts that do not bear interest — typically those of businesses — bringing the United States in line with several European countries, which have adopted such blanket guarantees. And the Federal Reserve would start a program to become the buyer of last resort for commercial paper, a move intended to help businesses get the money they need for day-to-day operations. Calling the need to inject money into banks regrettably, Mr. Paulson said it was nevertheless necessary. “The alternative of leaving businesses and consumers without access to financing is totally unacceptable,” Mr. Paulson said. “When financing isn’t available, consumers and businesses shrink their spending, which leads to businesses cutting jobs and even closing up shop.” Mr. Bernanke, echoing Mr. Paulson’s comments, said, “Americans can be confident that every resource is being brought to bear,” including political leadership. “I strongly believe” that the application of the measures together with resilience of American economy “will help restore confidence,” Mr. Bernanke said.   As the White House has done since the House of Representatives rejected the initial bailout legislation, Mr. Bush sought to assure Americans that the efforts were necessary to protect their savings and retirement. Each of the programs protects taxpayers, Mr. Bush said, and was “limited and temporary.” “I recognize that the action leaders are taking here in Washington and in European capitals can seem distant from those concerns,” he said. “But these efforts are designed to directly benefit the American people by stabilizing our overall financial system and helping our economy recover.” Mr. Paulson outlined the plan to eight of the nation’s leading bankers at a meeting Monday afternoon. He essentially told the participants that they would have to accept government investment for the good of the American financial system, according to officials. On Monday, big banks agreed to take investments totaling about $125 billion. Citigroup and JPMorgan Chase will receive $25 billion each. Bank of America, which is acquiring Merrill Lynch, and Wells Fargo, which is acquiring the Wachovia Corporation, will receive $25 billion. Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley will receive $10 billion each. And Bank of New York Mellon and State Street will get $2 billion to $3 billion. Another $125 billion is allocated for thousands of small and midsize banks. They will be eligible for government investments reflecting a similar proportion of their assets. On Tuesday, Mr. Paulson said that in return for the investment, the government would receive preferred shares and warrants for common stock. In addition, he said, the government would expect a reasonable return. And he said, “Institutions that sell shares to the government will accept restrictions on executive compensation, including a clawback provision and a ban on golden parachutes during the period that Treasury holds equity issued through this program.” Over the weekend, central banks flooded the system with billions of dollars in liquidity, throwing out the traditional financial playbook in favor of a series of moves that officials hoped would get banks lending again. European countries — including Britain, France, Germany and Spain — announced aggressive plans to guarantee bank debt, take ownership stakes in banks or prop up ailing companies with billions in taxpayer funds.
Skip to next paragraph
Kevin Lamarque/Reuters

Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr. at the White House on Monday evening.

Multimedia

The Rescue Plan and Its Largest RecipientsGraphic

The Rescue Plan and Its Largest Recipients

Beneficiary BanksGraphic

Beneficiary Banks

Brendan Smialowski for The New York Times

After meetings: John Mack, left, of Morgan Stanley, and Vikram Pandit of Citigroup.

The Treasury’s plan would help the United States catch up to Europe in what has become a footrace between countries to reassure investors that their banks will not default or that other countries will not one-up their rescue plans and, in so doing, siphon off bank deposits or investment capital. “The Europeans not only provided a blueprint, but forced our hand,” said Kenneth S. Rogoff, a professor of economics at Harvard and an adviser to John McCain, the Republican presidential nominee. “We’re trying to prevent wholesale carnage in the financial system.” In the process, Mr. Rogoff and other experts said, the government is remaking the financial landscape in ways that would have been unimaginable a few weeks ago — taking stakes in the industry and making Washington the ultimate guarantor for banking in the United States. But the pace of the crisis has driven events, and fissures in places as far-flung as Iceland, which suffered a wholesale collapse of its banks, persuaded officials to act far more decisively than they had previously. “Over the weekend, I thought it could come out very badly,” said Simon Johnson, a former chief economist of the International Monetary Fund. “But we stepped back from the cliff.” The guarantee on bank debt is similar to one announced by several European countries earlier on Monday, and is meant to unlock the lending market between banks. Banks have curtailed such lending — considered crucial to the smooth running of the financial system and the broader economy — because they fear they will not be repaid if a bank borrower runs into trouble. But officials said they hoped the guarantee on new senior debt would have an even broader effect than an interbank lending guarantee because it should also stimulate lending to businesses. Another part of the government’s remedy is to extend the federal deposit insurance to cover all small-business deposits. Federal regulators recently have been noticing that small-business customers, which tend to carry balances over the federal insurance limits, had been withdrawing their money from weaker banks and moving it to bigger, more stable banks. Congress had already raised the F.D.I.C.’s deposit insurance limit to $250,000 earlier this month, extending coverage to roughly 68 percent of small-business deposits, according to estimates by Oliver Wyman, a financial services consulting firm. The new rules would cover the remaining 32 percent. “Imposing unlimited deposit insurance doesn’t fix the underlying problem, but it does reduce the threat of overnight failures,” said Jaret Seiberg, a financial services policy analyst at the Stanford Group in Washington. “If you reduce the threat of overnight failures,” Mr. Seiberg said, “you start to encourage lending to each other overnight, which starts to restore the normal functioning of the credit markets.” Recapitalizing banks is not without its risks, experts warned, pointing to the example of Britain, which announced its program last week and injected its first capital into three banks on Monday. Shares of the newly nationalized banks — Royal Bank of Scotland, HBOS and Lloyds — slumped on Monday, despite a surge in banks elsewhere, because shareholder value was diluted by the government. The move, analysts said, makes the government Britain’s biggest banker. And it creates a two-tier banking system in which the nationalized banks are run like utilities and others are free to pursue profit growth. As part of the plan, the chief executives of the three banks stepped down. Still, Mr. Paulson’s strategy was backed by lawmakers, including Senator Charles E. Schumer, Democrat of New York, who said he preferred capital injections to buying distressed mortgage-related assets — a proposal that Treasury pushed aggressively before its turnabout. In a letter to Mr. Paulson on Monday, Mr. Schumer, chairman of the Joint Economic Committee, urged the Treasury to demand that banks receiving capital eliminate their dividends, restrict executive pay and stick to “safe and sustainable, rather than exotic, financial activities.” (Page 3 of 3)     “I don’t think making this as easy as possible for the financial institutions is the way to go,” Mr. Schumer said in a call with reporters. “You need some carrots but you also need some sticks.”
Skip to next paragraph
Brendan Smialowski for The New York Times

John Thain of Merrill Lynch.

Multimedia

The Rescue Plan and Its Largest RecipientsGraphic

The Rescue Plan and Its Largest Recipients

Beneficiary BanksGraphic

Beneficiary Banks

 

But officials said the banks would not be required to eliminate dividends, nor would the chief executives be asked to resign. They will, however, be held to strict restrictions on compensation, including a prohibition on golden parachutes and requirements to return any improper bonuses. Those rules were also part of the $700 billion bailout law passed by Congress. The nine chief executives met in a conference room outside Mr. Paulson’s ornate office, people briefed on the meeting said. They were seated across the table from Mr. Paulson; Ben S. Bernanke, chairman of the Federal Reserve; Timothy F. Geithner, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York; Federal Reserve Governor Kevin M. Warsh; the chairman of the F.D.I.C., Sheila C. Bair; and the comptroller of the currency, John C. Dugan. Among the bankers attending were Kenneth D. Lewis of Bank of America, Jamie Dimon of JPMorgan Chase, Lloyd C. Blankfein of Goldman Sachs, John J. Mack of Morgan Stanley, Vikram S. Pandit of Citigroup, Robert Kelly of Bank of New York Mellon and John A. Thain of Merrill Lynch. Bringing together all nine executives and directing them to participate was a way to avoid stigmatizing any one bank that chose to accept the government investment. The preferred stock that each bank will have to issue will pay special dividends, at a 5 percent interest rate that will be increased to 9 percent after five years. The government will also receive warrants worth 15 percent of the face value of the preferred stock. For instance, if the government makes a $10 billion investment, then the government will receive $1.5 billion in warrants. If the stock goes up, taxpayers will share the benefits. If the stock goes down, the warrants will be worthless. As Treasury embarked on its recapitalization plan, it offered some details on the nuts-and-bolts of the broader bailout effort. The program’s interim head, Neel T. Kashkari, said Treasury had filled several senior posts and selected the Wall Street firm Simpson Thacher as a legal adviser. It named an investment management consultant, Ennis Knupp, based in Chicago, to help it select asset management firms to buy distressed bank assets. And it plans to announce the firm that will serve as the program’s prime contractor, running auctions and holding assets, within the next day. “We are working around the clock to make it happen,” said Mr. Kashkari, a former Goldman Sachs banker who has been entrusted with the job of building this operation within weeks. As details of the American recapitalization plan emerged, fears grew over the impact on smaller countries. Iceland is discussing an aid package with the International Monetary Fund, a week after Reykjavik seized its three largest banks and shut down its stock market. The fund also offered “technical and financial” aid to Hungary, which last week suffered a run on its currency. Prime Minister Ferenc Gyurcsany said the country would accept aid only as a last resort. In a new report on capital flows, the Institute of International Finance projected that net capital in-flows to emerging markets would decline sharply, to $560 billion in 2009, from $900 billion last year. In Asia, markets continued to rise on Tuesday, lifted further by the announcement that the Japanese government would inject 1 trillion yen ($9.7 billion) into the financial system.

For Treasury Dept., Now Comes Hard Part of Bailout

Saturday, October 4th, 2008
For Treasury Dept., Now Comes Hard Part of Bailout
Brendan Smialowski/Getty Images

Henry M. Paulson Jr., the Treasury secretary, engineered the bailout plan, which officials said would have a policy on conflicts of interest as well as guidelines on compensation.


Article Tools Sponsored By
Published: October 3, 2008
WASHINGTON — It will be one of the world’s largest asset management firms with an impressive $700 billion war chest. Nothing short of the global economy depends on its success. And the Treasury Department has barely a month to get it up and running.
Skip to next paragraph The bailout bill that President Bush quickly signed into law on Friday must do what financial experts have been unable to do for the last year — put a dollar value on mortgage-related assets that no one wants, move them off the books of ailing banks and unlock the frozen credit markets. In signing the measure, Mr. Bush warned Americans not to expect instant results. “This will be done as expeditiously as possible, but it cannot be accomplished overnight. We’ll take the time necessary to design an effective program that achieves its objectives — and does not waste taxpayer dollars.” Even after working feverishly over the last two weeks, the Treasury will not buy its first distressed asset from a bank for roughly six weeks, and almost certainly not until after the Nov. 4 elections. Treasury officials do not plan to manage the mortgage assets on their own. Instead, they will outsource nearly all of the work to professionals, who will oversee huge portfolios of bonds and other securities for a management fee. The Treasury is expected to name a senior official to supervise the program. For now, various working groups creating the program are reporting directly to Henry M. Paulson Jr., the Treasury secretary. Mr. Paulson has recruited several former colleagues from Goldman Sachs to advise him, though administration officials took pains to say that they were not dominating the process, pointing to other Treasury employees who were playing major roles. “We will move rapidly to implement the new authorities, but we will also move methodically,” Mr. Paulson said in a statement after the House passed the bill on Friday. The government will hire only a bare-bones internal staff of about two dozen people with expertise in asset management, accounting and legal issues, according to administration officials, and will outsource the bulk of the program to 5 to 10 asset management firms. Administration officials said they had not yet selected the list of firms to run auctions or manage the assets. During the last few weeks, the Treasury has informally consulted major firms — including BlackRock, the Pacific Investment Management Company and Legg Mason — but none have been given a mandate, they said. The selected asset management firms will receive a chunk of the $250 billion that Congress is allowing the Treasury to spend in the first phase of the bailout. Those firms will receive fees that are likely to be lower than the industry standard of 1 percent of assets, or $1 for every $100 under management. Administration officials said they would try to drive down fees with a competitive bidding process. But with $700 billion to disburse, the plan could still generate tens of billions of dollars in fees if the firms negotiate anywhere close to their standard fees. The main mechanism for buying these assets will be reverse auctions, using the same principles that govern auctions of electricity or the wireless spectrum. In this case, the government will issue an offer to buy a class of assets — for example, subprime mortgage-backed securities — with the final price being determined by how many banks are willing to sell. Using outside contractors on such an extensive scale raises a host of thorny questions, outside experts said. Among the most pressing is: How will the Treasury avoid conflicts of interest that fund managers will encounter as they work both for their own clients’ interests — which could pay higher fees — and the interests of taxpayers? “With anyone short of the stature and honesty of a Paul Volcker running it, you need to worry a lot about conflicts of interest,” said Alan S. Blinder, a former vice chairman of the Federal Reserve, referring to its former head. “Unfortunately, there just aren’t many people with the expertise you need but without any possible conflicts.” The Treasury officials said they were still writing a policy on conflicts of interest as well as guidelines on compensation. As if the mechanics were not daunting enough, Treasury officials need to make wrenching decisions that will determine the bailout’s winners and losers. With so much money on the line, lobbyists for interest groups are already besieging the government to decide in their favor. The prospect of pitching in during a national crisis has drawn unsolicited offers from prominent asset managers, like William H. Gross, the managing director of Pimco, who offered his services free. In setting up the program, Mr. Paulson has relied on a cadre of former Goldman Sachs executives: Edward C. Forst, a former co-head of Goldman’s investment management business who is on leave from his job as executive vice president at Harvard; Kendrick R. Wilson III, formerly chairman of Goldman’s financial institutions groups; and Dan Jester, who was deputy chief financial officer at Goldman. (Page 2 of 2)     But administration officials said several other Treasury officials were playing crucial roles, including six assistant secretaries: Peter B. McCarthy, Phillip L. Swagel, Neel Kashkari, Kenneth E. Carfine, David G. Nason and Kevin I. Fromer, who led the Treasury’s negotiating team on Capitol Hill.
Skip to next paragraph Mr. Forst is expected to soon return to Harvard, where he helps manage its endowment fund. And with a change in administrations looming, many of the people involved in organizing the program will not be around to manage it. Still, the Treasury may not have trouble recruiting replacements, given the job losses that have plagued the finance industry. “There are a lot of people, because of the downsizing of Wall Street, who won’t be getting a paycheck at all,” said Joshua S. Siegel, the managing principal of Stone Capital Partners, a fund that manages $2.2 billion. “They would love to be involved.” Of all the challenges that the Treasury faces, the trickiest might be determining a price for the largely unwanted wreckage it will be buying. Many of the junk loans and mortgage-backed securities have no market price at all because they have no potential buyers. The firms hired by the government will have enormous power to push the “market” price up or down as they choose. If the government bargains to buy at the lowest possible price, it will protect taxpayers. But forcing the banks to book big losses could be self-defeating if they cannot resume lending until they raise fresh capital. If the government agrees to buy the assets at the value at which banks are keeping them on their balance sheets, taxpayers will almost certainly be overpaying. The “right” price will depend on whether the government is favoring buyers or sellers. Many banks are hoping that the government will pay close to par — the value listed in their books. But hedge fund managers and other potential buyers are demanding that the government push for the much lower price, based on the current trading value of the assets. These potential buyers are hoping they can piggyback onto the Treasury program, perhaps even acquiring distressed assets alongside the Treasury in auctions. There are similar debates over how the Treasury should organize the plan. Most financial experts agree it would be impossible to build an internal operation of this size in a few weeks. “It’s essential they outsource almost everything possible,” said T. Timothy Ryan Jr., president of the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association. “The one thing they can’t outsource is the final decision, and they can’t outsource the infrastructure — people, hiring policies, contracting rules. But they can hire people to do everything else.” Mr. Ryan is a former director of the Office of Thrift Supervision, where he played a key role in the savings and loan cleanup. Still, some investors are troubled by the government’s heavy reliance on private firms. They said it would be difficult to prevent firms from steering capital in ways that favor their private customers. Inevitably, large asset management firms own, or are tied to banks that own, some of the same securities the government is seeking to sell. Pimco, for example, is owned by Allianz, one of Germany’s largest insurance companies. Merrill Lynch owns a stake in BlackRock. “I can’t even fathom how I would manage that,” Mr. Siegel said. “How would I manage one side, where I’m seeking to maximize profit, and the other side, where I’m looking out for the social good?” The law stipulates that the government must prevent conflicts of interest in the hiring of firms, the decision of which assets to buy, the management of those assets and even the jobs held by employees after they leave the program. But it leaves the details to the Treasury. The Treasury plans to publish guidelines for hiring the asset management firms in the next day or two, officials said. Some experts say that the department simply needs to gird itself for protests. “You’re never going to get past conflicts of interest, so you take your lumps,” said Peter J. Wallison, who was general counsel of the Treasury during the Reagan administration. The bailout legislation itself highlights the contradictory goals that the Treasury will face when it goes on its buying spree. Among the goals it is supposed to consider are “protecting taxpayers,” “preventing disruption to financial markets” and “the need to help families keep their homes.” Democratic lawmakers insisted that the Treasury use its authority to help restructure many subprime mortgages so that at least some troubled homeowners could avoid foreclosure. But the Treasury’s auction plan will make that difficult. More than 90 percent of all subprime mortgages are part of giant pools, or trusts, which sell mortgage-backed securities to investors around the world. Before the government would be able to modify any mortgage that was in a trust, securities experts said, it would have to acquire agreement from 100 percent of the bondholders. But a senior Treasury official said the government would probably want to buy no more than half of the securities tied to a trust, which would hamper winning agreement from all investors. Treasury officials have emphasized that the government will also be buying up whole mortgages, which have not been securitized, and that it may well buy whole mortgages through one-on-one negotiations with individual banks. Officials said they would probably experiment with other approaches as well.

Bush and Candidates to Meet on Bailout

Thursday, September 25th, 2008
Published: September 24, 2008
WASHINGTON — President Bush appealed to the nation Wednesday night to support a $700 billion plan to avert a widespread financial meltdown, and signaled that he is willing to accept tougher controls over how the money is spent. As Democrats and the administration negotiated details of the package late into the night, the presidential candidates of both major parties planned to meet Mr. Bush at the White House on Thursday, along with leaders of Congress. The president said he hoped the session would “speed our discussions toward a bipartisan bill.” Mr. Bush used a prime-time address to warn Americans that “a long and painful recession” could occur if Congress does not act quickly. “Our entire economy is in danger,” he said. On Capitol Hill, Democrats said that progress toward a deal had come after the White House had offered two major concessions: a plan to limit pay of executives whose firms seek government assistance, and a provision that would give taxpayers an equity stake in some of the firms so that the government can profit if the companies prosper in the future. Details of those provisions, and many others, were still under discussion. Mr. Bush’s televised address, and his extraordinary offer to bring together Senator Barack Obama, the Democratic presidential nominee, and Senator John McCain, the Republican, just weeks before the election underscored a growing sense of urgency on the part of the administration that Congress must act to avert an economic collapse. It was the first time in Mr. Bush’s presidency that he delivered a prime-time speech devoted exclusively to the economy. It came at a time when deep public unease about shaky financial markets and the demise of Wall Street icons such as Lehman Brothers has been coupled with skepticism and anger directed at a government bailout that could become the most expensive in American history. The administration’s plan seeks to restore liquidity to the market and restore the economy by buying up distressed securities, many of them tied to mortgages, from struggling financial firms. The address capped a fast-moving and chaotic day, in Washington, on the presidential campaign trail and on Wall Street. On Capitol Hill, delicate negotiations between Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr. and Congressional leaders were complicated by resistance from rank-and-file lawmakers, who were fielding torrents of complaints from constituents furious that their tax money was going to be spent to clean up a mess created by high-paid financial executives. On Wall Street, financial markets continued to struggle. The cost of borrowing for banks, businesses and consumers shot up and investors rushed to safe havens like Treasury bills — a reminder that credit markets, which had recovered somewhat after Mr. Paulson announced the broad outlines of the bailout plan last week, remain under severe stress, with many investors still skittish. Senator Christopher J. Dodd, Democrat of Connecticut and chairman of the banking committee, said a deal could come together as early as Thursday. “Working in a bipartisan manner, we have made progress,” the House speaker, Nancy Pelosi, and Representative John A. Boehner, the Republican leader, said in a joint statement. “We agree that key changes should be made to the administration’s proposal. It must include basic good-government principles, including rigorous and independent oversight, strong executive compensation standards and protections for taxpayers.” Mr. Bush used his speech to signal that he was willing to address lawmakers’ concerns, including fears that tax dollars will be used to pay Wall Street executives and that the plan would put too much authority in the hands of the Treasury secretary without sufficient oversight. “Any rescue plan should also be designed to ensure that taxpayers are protected,” Mr. Bush said. “It should welcome the participation of financial institutions, large and small. It should make certain that failed executives do not receive a windfall from your tax dollars. It should establish a bipartisan board to oversee the plan’s implementation. And it should be enacted as soon as possible.” The speech came after the White House, under pressure from Republican lawmakers, opened an aggressive effort to portray the financial rescue package as crucial not just to stabilize Wall Street but to protect the livelihoods of all Americans. But the White House gave careful thought to the timing; aides to Mr. Bush said they did not want to appear to have the president forcing a solution on Congress. On Capitol Hill, Mr. Paulson, facing a second day of questioning by lawmakers, this time before the House Financial Services Committee, tried to focus as much on Main Street as Wall Street. “This entire proposal is about benefiting the American people because today’s fragile financial system puts their economic well being at risk,” Mr. Paulson said. Without action, he added: “Americans’ personal savings and the ability of consumers and business to finance spending, investment and job creation are threatened.” But it was the comments of Mr. Paulson, a former chief of Goldman Sachs, about limiting the pay of executives that signaled the biggest shift in the White House position and the urgency that the administration has placed in winning Congressional approval as quickly as possible. “The American people are angry about executive compensation, and rightly so,” he said. “No one understands pay for failure.” Officials said the legislation would almost certainly include a ban on so-called golden parachutes, the generous severance packages that many executives receive on their way out the door, for firms that seek government help. The measure also is likely to include a mechanism for firms to recover any bonus or incentive pay based on corporate earnings or other results that later turn out to have been overstated. Democrats were also working to include tax provisions that would cap the amount of an executive’s salary that a company could deduct to $400,000 — the amount earned by the president. At the same time, Congressional Democrats said they were prepared to drop one of their most contentious demands: new authority for bankruptcy judges to modify the terms of first mortgages. That provision was heavily opposed by Senate Republicans. In addition, Democrats also are leaning toward authorizing the entire $700 billion that Mr. Paulson is seeking but disbursing a smaller amount, perhaps only $150 billion, to start the program, with future funds dependent on how well it is working. Representative Barney Frank of Massachusetts, the lead negotiator for Congressional Democrats, said they also planned to insert a tax break to aid community banks that have suffered steep losses on preferred stock that they own in the mortgage finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. That change is in addition to others that already have been accepted by Mr. Paulson that would create an independent oversight board and require the government to do more to prevent foreclosures.
Mark Landler and Carl Hulse contributed reporting.

Congress Urged to Act Soon on Bailout

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008
Congress Urged to Act Soon on Bailout
Susan Walsh/Associated Press

Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr. and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke in Washington today.


Article Tools Sponsored By
Published: September 23, 2008
WASHINGTON — Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr. called on Congress Tuesday to give him wide authority to rescue the nation’s financial system, urging lawmakers “to enact this bill quickly and cleanly, and avoid slowing it down with other provisions that are unrelated or don’t have broad support.” In remarks prepared for testimony before the Senate Banking Committee, Mr. Paulson said that “this troubled asset purchase program is the single most effective thing we can do to help homeowners, the American people, and stimulate our economy.” He noted that Congress had moved quickly earlier this year to pass an economic stimulus program. The challenge this time, he said, was greater and demanded “bipartisan discipline and urgency.” With global financial stresses and uncertainties continuing to play out, the chairman of the Federal Reserve, Ben S. Bernanke, warned in his testimony prepared for the hearing that “if financial conditions fail to improve for a protracted period, the implications for the broader economy could be quite adverse.” President Bush, speaking in New York before the markets opened, expressed confidence that Congress would agree on a financial bailout plan and left open the possibility of accepting amendments being proposed by Democrats. “Now there’s a natural give and take when it comes to the legislative process,” Mr. Bush said in brief remarks with the president of Pakistan, Asif Ali Zardari. “There are good ideas that need to be listened to in order to get a good bill that will address the situation. But I’m confident, Mr. President, as I’ve told you and other leaders, that there will be a bipartisan bill. That the Republicans and Democrats will come together to get this legislation passed, which is necessary to address the financial situation and provide a rescue plan to make sure that there’s some stability in the markets.” In a statement released earlier in the day, Mr. Bush said he had reassured worried world leaders that the United States had the “right plan” to deal with the crisis. Mr. Paulson noted in his prepared remarks that Congress had moved quickly earlier this year to pass an economic stimulus program. The challenge this time, he said, was greater and demanded “bipartisan discipline and urgency.” The Treasury secretary, who was scheduled to testify alongside Mr. Bernanke and other officials, was expected to encounter questioning from lawmakers about the scope of the program. Democrats and Republicans are eager to include legislation that would protect mortgage holders, and cut the salaries of executives at Wall Street firms. The testimony came as the Bush administration and Congressional leaders moved closer to agreement on an historic $700 billion bailout for financial firms, including tight oversight of the program and new efforts to help homeowners at risk of foreclosure. But Congress and the administration remained at odds over the demands of some lawmakers, including limits on the pay of top executives, and new authority to allow bankruptcy judges to reduce mortgage payments for borrowers facing foreclosure. Congressional leaders and Treasury officials also said they were close to an agreement over a proposal by some Democrats in which taxpayers could receive an ownership stake, in the form of warrants to buy stock, from firms seeking to sell distressed debt. Lawmakers want to require an equity stake, while the administration wants flexibility on that matter, a Treasury official said. In his prepared remarks, Mr. Bernanke said the Fed was reluctant to intervene in the market, saying it should be done “only when the stability of the financial system and, consequently, the health of the broader economy is at risk.” Such conditions applied in the deteriorating financial situation at the mortgage finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, Mr. Bernanke said. He also said that the government tried to let market forces handle the problems at the investment bank Lehman Brothers and the insurance giant American International Group, but the rapid sequences of events caused “extraordinarily turbulent conditions in global financial markets.” Even after the actions of the Fed and the Treasury, Mr. Bernanke said, “global financial markets remain under extraordinary stress. Action by the Congress is required to stabilize the situation and avert what otherwise could be very serious consequences for our financial markets and our economy.” Mr. Bernanke’s testimony was exceptionally brief, considering the enormous stakes involved in Congressional action a mere nine paragraphs, much of it devoted to a recapitulation of the growing crisis and how it took shape. It seemed to reflect the way Mr. Paulson and the administration have presented the bailout legislation, in bare-bones fashion, but with a clear tone of urgency. But the chairman of the committee, Senator Christopher J. Dodd of Connecticut, said in his prepared remarks that Mr. Paulson’s proposal was “stunning and unprecedented in its scope and lack of detail.” He criticized the plan for doing nothing to prevent Wall Street executives from unloading troubled loans and “walking away with a bonus and a golden parachute.” Saying that the plan would allow Mr. Paulson to act with “absolute impunity,” Senator Dodd said, “After reading this proposal, I can only conclude that it is not our economy that is at risk, Mr. Secretary, but our Constitution, as well.” Despite the minimalism of the two officials’ prepared messages, both were certain to be pressed for greater detail by lawmakers concerned about the huge amounts involved and what many consider the inadequate oversight being provided. Mr. Bush, who released a written statement on Monday before departing for New York to attend the opening of the United Nations General Assembly, said that world leaders had questioned him about the turmoil and the administration’s response, “wondering whether or not the United States has the right plan to deal with this economic crisis.” “And I’ve assured them that the plan laid out by Secretary Paulson is a robust plan to deal with a serious problem,” he went on. “And now they’re wondering about our Congress, and I’ve assured them as well, having spoken to the leaders of Congress from both political parties, there is the desire to get something done quickly.” The White House has begun intensive lobbying to persuade nervous lawmakers to support the plan. Vice President Dick Cheney, the White House chief of staff Joshua B. Bolten and Keith Hennessy, the chairman of Mr. Bush’s National Economics Council, were all headed to Capitol Hill on Tuesday. Tony Fratto, Mr. Bush’s deputy secretary, told reporters there is a “great sense of urgency” to get the legislation passed this week.
Mark Landler reported from Washington; Steven Lee Myers reported from New York. Brian Knowlton and Sheryl Gay Stolberg contributed reporting from Washington.